Summary: The Investigator affirmed the decision of Tusla.
Date: 30-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-150970-C4G1Y5
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.17, s.17(4),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE’s decision to refuse the request under section 30(1)(a) of the Act.
Date: 30-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-152090-V6F9K0
Public Body: Health Service Executive
Section of the Act.: s.30, s.30(1)(a), s.30(1)(b), s.35,
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the WRC’s decision.
Date: 26-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-155133-R6B3L6
Public Body: Workplace Relations Commission
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: Dublin City Council
Date: 23-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-155874-N1Q7N4
Public Body: Dublin City Council
Section of the Act.: s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Senior Investigator affirmed the Board’s decision.
Date: 22-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-151364-Y7V5H7
Public Body: Legal Aid Board
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed the Department’s decision.
Date: 22-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-155646-N1G7B0
Public Body: Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator varied the Department’s decision. She found that it was not justified in refusing to release an attachment to records 1 and 2 under section 15(1)(i) and directed its release. However, she affirmed its decision to refuse access to the remaining records under sections 15(1)(d), 15(1)(i), 31(1)(a), 37(1) and 42(f) of the FOI Act, and its refusal to confirm or deny the existence of certain records under section 37(6).
Date: 22-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-151302-X7Z9K5
Public Body: The Department of Justice
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(d), s.15(1)(i), s.31, s.31(1)(a), s.37, s.37(1), s.42, s.42(f),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed Tusla’s decision.
Date: 20-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-155558-H0W7T3
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a),
Summary: The Investigator annulled the decision of UCD.
Date: 20-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-158001-F4N0S0
Public Body: University College Dublin
Section of the Act.: s.14, s.14(1),
Summary: The Investigator affirmed Tusla’s decision. She found that it was justified in refusing access to a particular record on the basis of section 42(m)(i). She found that it was justified in refusing access to further records on the basis of section 15(1)(a) and on the grounds that such records do not exist or cannot be found.
Date: 19-05-2025
Case Number: OIC-150919-D8W7C7
Public Body: Tusla
Section of the Act.: s.15, s.15(1)(a), s.42, s.42(m)(i),